イソジンガーグルは有効か? 
m3Comカンファレンスの要約  12/03/14
・粘膜障害性のあるイソジンより、抗酸化作用、抗炎症作用のあるアズノールのほうがいい 
 ・アズノールはヨード臭・味もなく、メントールが入っているのでさわやか
褥瘡の治療にイソジン消毒が逆効果だった.。
・法的に禁止にするか、製造禁にでもなれば処方しないが、出せという人には出さないわけにはいかない
・マイナス効果だと思う理由
 1. 気道感染を起こすウイルスは上咽頭に付着、ここで増殖を開始するのでうがいをしてもこれを阻止できない
 2. 消毒薬の効果は、咽頭の常在菌叢を減少させ、それにより病原体を逆に増殖させる
 3. ポピドンヨードの粘膜障害でさらに病原体を繁殖させる
表面だけの消毒だけなので効果は期待できないが、感染初期の粘膜表面だけの病巣なら有効かもしれない
・扁桃炎のように細菌や真菌による急性の炎症には有効。
 ・細菌による粘膜障害>>イソジンによる粘膜障害
ヨードうがいとうがい介入なしは同じ発生率、水うがいは発生率が低い(※下の文献)・
  2005 Nov;29(4):302-7.

Prevention of upper respiratory tract infections by gargling: a randomized trial.

Source

Department of Public Health and International Health, Kyoto University School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:


Gargling to wash the throat is commonly performed in Japan, and people believe that such hygienic routine, especially with gargle medicine, prevents upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs). Its effectiveness, however, has not been established by clinical trials.

DESIGN:


Randomized controlled trial carried out in 2002-2003 winter season and analyzed in 2003 and 2004.

PARTICIPANTS:


Healthy volunteers (387) aged 18 to 65 years.

INTERVENTION:


Participants were randomly assigned to water gargling, povidone-iodine gargling, and usual care (control). Subjects in the two gargling groups were requested to gargle with water or diluted povidone-iodine at least three times a day. Participants were followed for 60 days.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:


he primary outcome measure was first URTI incidence. Severity of URTI symptoms among incident cases was also evaluated. Both outcomes were assessed with a self-administered symptom record. Analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis.

RESULTS:


A total of 130 participants contracted URTIs. The incidence rate of first URTI was 0.26 episodes/30 person-days among control subjects. The rate decreased to 0.17 episodes/30 person-days in the water gargling group, and 0.24 episodes/30 person-days in the povidone-iodine gargling group. Respective incidence rate ratios against controls were 0.64 (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.41-0.99) and 0.89 (95% CI=0.60-1.33). A Cox regression (proportional hazard model) revealed the efficacy of water gargling (hazard ratio=0.60, 95% CI=0.39-0.95). Even when a URTI occurred, water gargling tended to attenuate bronchial symptoms (p=0.055).

CONCLUSIONS:


Simple water gargling was effective to prevent URTIs among healthy people. This virtually cost-free modality would appreciably benefit the general population.

戻る